BROCHURES / DOCUMENTATION
APPLICATION NOTES
SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS
You are researching: Univerity of Hong Kong
Drug Delivery
Biological Molecules
Solid Dosage Drugs
Stem Cells
Personalised Pharmaceuticals
Inducend Pluripotent Stem Cells (IPSCs)
Drug Discovery
Cancer Cell Lines
Cell Type
Tissue and Organ Biofabrication
Skin Tissue Engineering
All Groups
- Cell Type
- Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs)
- Organoids
- Stem Cells
- Spheroids
- Meniscus Cells
- Synoviocytes
- Keratinocytes
- Skeletal Muscle-Derived Cells (SkMDCs)
- Neurons
- Macrophages
- Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells
- Endothelial
- CardioMyocites
- Melanocytes
- Retinal
- Chondrocytes
- Embrionic Kidney (HEK)
- Corneal Stromal Cells
- Annulus Fibrosus Cells
- Fibroblasts
- β cells
- Astrocytes
- Myoblasts
- Pericytes
- Hepatocytes
- Cancer Cell Lines
- Bacteria
- Epicardial Cells
- Articular cartilage progenitor cells (ACPCs)
- Tenocytes
- Extracellular Vesicles
- Osteoblasts
- Monocytes
- Mesothelial cells
- Nucleus Pulposus Cells
- Epithelial
- Neutrophils
- Adipocytes
- Smooth Muscle Cells
- T cells
- Institution
- Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW)
- Innotere
- L'Oreal
- Tiangong University
- Xi’an Children’s Hospital
- ETH Zurich
- Hallym University
- Nanjing Medical University
- University of Bordeaux
- Innsbruck University
- DWI – Leibniz Institute
- Nanyang Technological University
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering (NIMTE)
- KU Leuven
- Politecnico di Torino
- Utrecht Medical Center (UMC)
- Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute
- Queen Mary University
- Veterans Administration Medical Center
- University of Manchester
- University of Bucharest
- Royal Free Hospital
- Hong Kong University
- University of Barcelona
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- ENEA
- University of Nottingham
- University of Geneva
- SINTEF
- Rice University
- Jiangsu University
- Trinity College
- Novartis
- University of Central Florida
- Hefei University
- Leibniz University Hannover
- Chalmers University of Technology
- Karlsruhe institute of technology
- University of Freiburg
- Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland
- Leipzig University
- AO Research Institute (ARI)
- Shanghai University
- Univerity of Hong Kong
- University of Toronto
- Brown University
- Polish Academy of Sciences
- University of Wurzburg
- Technical University of Dresden
- University of Nantes
- Montreal University
- Shandong Medical University
- Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC)
- University of Michigan – School of Dentistry
- Myiongji University
- Harbin Institute of Technology
- Technical University of Berlin
- University of Amsterdam
- University of Tel Aviv
- University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland
- Anhui Polytechnic
- University Children's Hospital Zurich
- Bayreuth University
- Aschaffenburg University
- University of Michigan, Biointerfaces Institute
- Abu Dhabi University
- Jiao Tong University
- University of Aveiro
- Ghent University
- Chiao Tung University
- Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute
- University of Sheffield
- University of Michigan – Biointerfaces Institute
- National University of Singapore
- CIC biomaGUNE
- Kaohsiung Medical University
- DTU – Technical University of Denmark
- University of Taiwan
- Adolphe Merkle Institute Fribourg
- Halle-Wittenberg University
- Baylor College of Medicine
- INM – Leibniz Institute for New Materials
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
- University of Vilnius
- Biomaterials & Bioinks
- Application
- Bioelectronics
- Biomaterial Processing
- Tissue Models – Drug Discovery
- Industrial
- Drug Discovery
- In Vitro Models
- Robotics
- Electronics – Robotics – Industrial
- Medical Devices
- Tissue and Organ Biofabrication
- Bone Tissue Engineering
- Dental Tissue Engineering
- Drug Delivery
- Urethra Tissue Engineering
- Skin Tissue Engineering
- Uterus Tissue Engineering
- Nerve – Neural Tissue Engineering
- Meniscus Tissue Engineering
- Heart – Cardiac Patches Tissue Engineering
- Adipose Tissue Engineering
- Trachea Tissue Engineering
- Ocular Tissue Engineering
- Intervertebral Disc (IVD) Tissue Engineering
- Muscle Tissue Engineering
- Liver tissue Engineering
- Cartilage Tissue Engineering
- BioSensors
- Personalised Pharmaceuticals
- Review Paper
- Printing Technology
- Biomaterial
- Thermoplastics
- Coaxial Extruder
- Non-cellularized gels/pastes
- Magnetorheological fluid (MR fluid – MRF)
- Salecan
- Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA)
- PEDOT
- Jeffamine
- Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)
- Polyethylene
- SEBS
- Polypropylene Oxide (PPO)
- Carbopol
- Sucrose Acetate
- Epoxy
- poly (ethylene-co -vinyl acetate) (PEVA)
- Poly(itaconate-co-citrate-cooctanediol) (PICO)
- Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm)
- Mineral Oil
- poly(octanediol-co-maleic anhydride-co-citrate) (POMaC)
- Poly(Oxazoline)
- Poly(trimethylene carbonate)
- 2-hydroxyethyl) methacrylate (HEMA)
- Zein
- Acrylamide
- Pluronic – Poloxamer
- Polyisobutylene
- Paraffin
- Silicone
- Konjac Gum
- Polyphenylene Oxide
- Ionic Liquids
- Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)
- Gelatin-Sucrose Matrix
- Salt-based
- Chlorella Microalgae
- Acrylates
- Poly(Vinyl Formal)
- 2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate (HEMA)
- Phenylacetylene
- Micro/nano-particles
- Biological Molecules
- Bioinks
- Polyethylene glycol (PEG) based
- α-Bioink
- Poly(Acrylic Acid)
- Collagen
- Elastin
- Heparin
- sulfobetaine methacrylate (SBMA)
- Gelatin
- Matrigel
- Gellan Gum
- Methacrylated Chitosan
- Methacrylated hyaluronic acid (HAMA)
- Pectin
- Silk Fibroin
- Pyrogallol
- Xanthan Gum
- Fibrinogen
- Fibrin
- Paeoniflorin
- Fibronectin
- (2-Hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (HPMA)
- Methacrylated Collagen (CollMA)
- Carrageenan
- Glucosamine
- Chitosan
- Glycerol
- Poly(glycidol)
- Alginate
- Agarose
- Gelatin-Methacryloyl (GelMA)
- methacrylated chondroitin sulfate (CSMA)
- Cellulose
- Novogel
- carboxybetaine acrylamide (CBAA)
- Hyaluronic Acid
- Peptide gel
- Methacrylated Silk Fibroin
- Pantoan Methacrylate
- Ceramics
- Decellularized Extracellular Matrix (dECM)
- Metals
- Solid Dosage Drugs
- Bioprinting Technologies
- Bioprinting Applications
AUTHOR
Title
Low temperature hybrid 3D printing of hierarchically porous bone tissue engineering scaffolds with in situ delivery of osteogenic peptide and mesenchymal stem cells
[Abstract]
Year
2022
Journal/Proceedings
Biofabrication
Reftype
DOI/URL
DOI
Groups
AbstractCompared to other conventional scaffold fabrication techniques, three-dimensional (3D) printing is advantageous in producing bone tissue engineering scaffolds with customized shape, tailored pore size/porosity, required mechanical properties and even desirable biomolecule delivery capability. However, for scaffolds with a large volume, it is highly difficult to get seeded cells to migrate to the central region of the scaffolds, resulting in an inhomogeneous cell distribution and therefore lowering the bone forming ability. To overcome this major obstacle, in this study, cell-laden bone tissue engineering scaffolds consisting of osteogenic peptide (OP) loaded β-tricalcium phosphate (TCP)/poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) (OP/TCP/PLGA, designated as OTP) nanocomposite struts and rat bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cell (rBMSC)-laden gelatin/GelMA hydrogel rods were produced through ‘dual-nozzle’ low temperature hybrid 3D printing. The cell-laden scaffolds exhibited a bi-phasic structure and had a mechanical modulus of about 19.6 MPa, which was similar to that of human cancellous bone. OP can be released from the hybrid scaffolds in a sustained manner and achieved a cumulative release level of about 78% after 24 d. rBMSCs encapsulated in the hydrogel rods exhibited a cell viability of about 87.4% right after low temperature hybrid 3D printing and could be released from the hydrogel rods to achieve cell anchorage on the surface of adjacent OTP struts. The OP released from OTP struts enhanced rBMSCs proliferation. Compared to rBMSC-laden hybrid scaffolds without OP incorporation, the rBMSC-laden hybrid scaffolds incorporated with OP significantly up-regulated osteogenic differentiation of rBMSCs by showing a higher level of alkaline phosphatase expression and calcium deposition. This ‘proof-of-concept’ study has provided a facile method to form cell-laden bone tissue engineering scaffolds with not only required mechanical strength, biomimetic structure and sustained biomolecule release profile but also excellent cell delivery capability with uniform cell distribution, which can improve the bone forming ability in the body.
AUTHOR
Title
3D-printed nanocomposite scaffolds with tunable magnesium ionic microenvironment induce in situ bone tissue regeneration
[Abstract]
Year
2019
Journal/Proceedings
Applied Materials Today
Reftype
Groups
AbstractLocal tissue microenvironment is able to regulate cell-to-cell interaction that leads to effective tissue repair. This study aims to demonstrate a tunable magnesium ionic (Mg2+) microenvironment in bony tissue that can significantly induce bone defect repair. The concept can be realized by using a newly fabricated nanocomposite comprising of custom-made copolymer polycaprolactone-co-poly(ethylene glycol)-co-polycaprolactone (PCL-PEG-PCL) and surface-modified magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles. In this study, additive manufacturing (AM) technology had been adopted to help design the porous three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds with tunable Mg2+ microenvironment. We found that the wettability and printability of new copolymer had been improved as compared with that of PCL polymer. Additionally, when MgO nanoparticles incorporated into the newly synthesized hydrophilic copolymer matrix, it could lead to increased compressive moduli significantly. In the in vitro studies, the fabricated nanocomposite scaffold with low concentration of Mg2+ microenvironment not only demonstrated better cytocompatibility, but also remarkably enhanced osteogenic differentiation in vitro as compared with the pure PCL and PCL-PEG-PCL co-polymer controls. In the animal studies, we also found that superior and early bone formation and tissue mineralization could be observed in the same 3D printed scaffold. However, the nanocomposite scaffold with high concentration of Mg2+ jeopardized the in situ bony tissue regeneration capability due to excessive magnesium ions in bone tissue microenvironment. Lastly, this study demonstrates that the nanocomposite 3D scaffold with controlled magnesium concentration in bone tissue microenvironment can effectively promote bone defect repair.