BROCHURES / DOCUMENTATION
APPLICATION NOTES
SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS
You are researching: Pectin
Cell Type
Tissue and Organ Biofabrication
Skin Tissue Engineering
Drug Delivery
Biological Molecules
Solid Dosage Drugs
Stem Cells
Personalised Pharmaceuticals
Inducend Pluripotent Stem Cells (IPSCs)
Drug Discovery
Cancer Cell Lines
All Groups
- +Printing Technology
- +Biomaterial
- +Ceramics
- +Metals
- +Bioinks
- Fibronectin
- Xanthan Gum
- Paeoniflorin
- Methacrylated Silk Fibroin
- Heparin
- Fibrinogen
- (2-Hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (HPMA)
- Carrageenan
- Chitosan
- Glycerol
- Poly(glycidol)
- Agarose
- methacrylated chondroitin sulfate (CSMA)
- Silk Fibroin
- Methacrylated hyaluronic acid (HAMA)
- Gellan Gum
- Alginate
- Gelatin-Methacryloyl (GelMA)
- Cellulose
- Hyaluronic Acid
- Polyethylene glycol (PEG) based
- Collagen
- Gelatin
- Novogel
- Peptide gel
- α-Bioink
- Elastin
- Matrigel
- Methacrylated Chitosan
- Pectin
- Pyrogallol
- Fibrin
- Methacrylated Collagen (CollMA)
- Glucosamine
- +Non-cellularized gels/pastes
- 2-hydroxyethyl) methacrylate (HEMA)
- Paraffin
- Polyphenylene Oxide
- Acrylamide
- SEBS
- Ionic Liquids
- Jeffamine
- Mineral Oil
- Salecan
- Zein
- poly(octanediol-co-maleic anhydride-co-citrate) (POMaC)
- Poly(itaconate-co-citrate-cooctanediol) (PICO)
- Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)
- Salt-based
- Acrylates
- 2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate (HEMA)
- Magnetorheological fluid (MR fluid – MRF)
- Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA)
- PEDOT
- Polyethylene
- Silicone
- Pluronic – Poloxamer
- Carbopol
- Epoxy
- poly (ethylene-co -vinyl acetate) (PEVA)
- Phenylacetylene
- Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm)
- Poly(Oxazoline)
- Poly(trimethylene carbonate)
- Polyisobutylene
- Konjac Gum
- Gelatin-Sucrose Matrix
- Chlorella Microalgae
- Poly(Vinyl Formal)
- +Thermoplastics
- +Micro/nano-particles
- +Biological Molecules
- Decellularized Extracellular Matrix (dECM)
- Solid Dosage Drugs
- Review Paper
- +Application
- Tissue Models – Drug Discovery
- BioSensors
- Personalised Pharmaceuticals
- +In Vitro Models
- +Bioelectronics
- Industrial
- Robotics
- Medical Devices
- Electronics – Robotics – Industrial
- Biomaterial Processing
- +Tissue and Organ Biofabrication
- Liver tissue Engineering
- Muscle Tissue Engineering
- Nerve – Neural Tissue Engineering
- Meniscus Tissue Engineering
- Heart – Cardiac Patches Tissue Engineering
- Adipose Tissue Engineering
- Trachea Tissue Engineering
- Ocular Tissue Engineering
- Intervertebral Disc (IVD) Tissue Engineering
- Vascularization
- Skin Tissue Engineering
- Drug Delivery
- Cartilage Tissue Engineering
- Bone Tissue Engineering
- Drug Discovery
- +Institution
- Myiongji University
- Hong Kong University
- Veterans Administration Medical Center
- University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland
- University of Michigan, Biointerfaces Institute
- Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute
- Kaohsiung Medical University
- Baylor College of Medicine
- L'Oreal
- University of Bordeaux
- KU Leuven
- Abu Dhabi University
- University of Sheffield
- DTU – Technical University of Denmark
- Hefei University
- Rice University
- University of Barcelona
- INM – Leibniz Institute for New Materials
- University of Nantes
- Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC)
- University of Amsterdam
- Bayreuth University
- Ghent University
- National University of Singapore
- Adolphe Merkle Institute Fribourg
- Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW)
- Hallym University
- University of Wurzburg
- AO Research Institute (ARI)
- Chalmers University of Technology
- ETH Zurich
- Nanyang Technological University
- Utrecht Medical Center (UMC)
- University of Manchester
- University of Nottingham
- Trinity College
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute
- University of Bucharest
- Innotere
- Nanjing Medical University
- Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering (NIMTE)
- Queen Mary University
- Royal Free Hospital
- SINTEF
- University of Central Florida
- University of Freiburg
- Halle-Wittenberg University
- CIC biomaGUNE
- Chiao Tung University
- University of Geneva
- Novartis
- Karlsruhe institute of technology
- Shanghai University
- Technical University of Dresden
- University of Michigan – School of Dentistry
- University of Tel Aviv
- Aschaffenburg University
- Univerity of Hong Kong
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland
- Brown University
- Innsbruck University
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
- Tiangong University
- Harbin Institute of Technology
- Montreal University
- Anhui Polytechnic
- Jiao Tong University
- University of Toronto
- Politecnico di Torino
- +Biomaterials & Bioinks
- +Bioprinting Technologies
- Bioprinting Applications
- +Cell Type
- Organoids
- Meniscus Cells
- Skeletal Muscle-Derived Cells (SkMDCs)
- Hepatocytes
- Monocytes
- Neutrophils
- Macrophages
- Corneal Stromal Cells
- Mesothelial cells
- Adipocytes
- Synoviocytes
- Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells
- +Epithelial
- Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs)
- Spheroids
- Keratinocytes
- Neurons
- Endothelial
- CardioMyocites
- Osteoblasts
- Articular cartilage progenitor cells (ACPCs)
- +Cancer Cell Lines
- Chondrocytes
- Fibroblasts
- Myoblasts
- Melanocytes
- Retinal
- Embrionic Kidney (HEK)
- β cells
- Pericytes
- Bacteria
- Tenocytes
- +Stem Cells
AUTHOR
Title
3D double-reinforced graphene oxide – nanocellulose biomaterial inks for tissue engineered constructs
[Abstract]
Year
2023
Journal/Proceedings
RSC Adv.
Reftype
DOI/URL
DOI
Groups
AbstractThe advent of improved fabrication technologies{,} particularly 3D printing{,} has enabled the engineering of bone tissue for patient-specific healing and the fabrication of in vitro tissue models for ex vivo testing. However{,} inks made from natural polymers often fall short in terms of mechanical strength{,} stability{,} and the induction of osteogenesis. Our research focused on developing novel printable formulations using a gelatin/pectin polymeric matrix that integrate synergistic reinforcement components i.e. graphene oxide (GO) and oxidized nanocellulose fibers (CNF). Using 3D printing technology and the aforementioned biomaterial composite inks{,} bone-like scaffolds were created. To simulate critical-sized flaws and demonstrate scaffold fidelity{,} 3D scaffolds were successfully printed using formulations with varied GO concentrations (0.25{,} 0.5{,} and 1% wt with respect to polymer content). The addition of GO to hydrogel inks enhanced not only the compressive modulus but also the printability and scaffold fidelity compared to the pure colloid-gelatin/pectin system. Due to its strong potential for 3D bioprinting{,} the sample containing 0.5% GO is shown to have the greatest perspectives for bone tissue models and tissue engineering applications.
AUTHOR
Title
Extrusion 3D printing with Pectin-based ink formulations: Recent trends in tissue engineering and food manufacturing
[Abstract]
Year
2021
Journal/Proceedings
Biomedical Engineering Advances
Reftype
Groups
Abstract3D printing technologies are rapidly revolutionizing all manufacturing sectors due to their ability to create objects with complex geometries in a reproducible and automated manner using material/cell-based formulations, precisely termed printing inks. In this regard, pectin, a naturally occurring plant polysaccharide, has been proposed as a potential component of ink formulations. In this mini-review, we would overview the most recent advances made with pectin-based inks in the fields of tissue engineering and food manufacturing. We also discuss various strategies used to formulate 3D printable pectin inks. Finally, various challenges and prospects for future development are discussed.
AUTHOR
Title
Recent trends in natural polysaccharide based bioinks for multiscale 3D printing in tissue regeneration: A review
[Abstract]
Year
2021
Journal/Proceedings
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Reftype
AbstractBiofabrication by three-dimensional (3D) printing has been an attractive technology in harnessing the possibility to print anatomical shaped native tissues with controlled architecture and resolution. 3D printing offers the possibility to reproduce complex microarchitecture of native tissues by printing live cells in a layer by layer deposition to provide a biomimetic structural environment for tissue formation and host tissue integration. Plant based biomaterials derived from green and sustainable sources have represented to emulate native physicochemical and biological cues in order to direct specific cellular response and formation of new tissues through biomolecular recognition patterns. This comprehensive review aims to analyze and identify the most commonly used plant based bioinks for 3D printing applications. An overview on the role of different plant based biomaterial of terrestrial origin (Starch, Nanocellulose and Pectin) and marine origin (Ulvan, Alginate, Fucoidan, Agarose and Carrageenan) used for 3D printing applications are discussed elaborately. Furthermore, this review will also emphasis in the functional aspects of different 3D printers, appropriate printing material, merits and demerits of numerous plant based bioinks in developing 3D printed tissue-like constructs. Additionally, the underlying potential benefits, limitations and future perspectives of plant based bioinks for tissue engineering (TE) applications are also discussed.
AUTHOR
Year
2019
Journal/Proceedings
Carbohydrate Polymers
Reftype
Groups
AbstractThe assessment of several ink formulations for 3D printing based on two natural macromolecular compounds is presented. In the current research we have exploited the fast crosslinking potential of pectin and the remarkable shear-thinning properties of carboxylated cellulose nanofibrils, which is known to induce a desired viscoelastic behavior. Prior to 3D printing, the viscoelastic properties of the polysaccharide inks were evaluated by rheological measurements and injectability tests. The reliance of the printing parameters on the ink composition was established through one-dimensional lines printing, the base units of 3D-structures. The performance of the 3D-printed structures after ionic cross-linking was evaluated in terms of mechanical properties and rehydration behavior. MicroCT was also used to evaluate the morphology of the 3D-printed objects regarding the effect of pectin/nanocellulose ratio on the geometrical features of scaffolds. The proportionality between the two polymers proved to be the determining factor for the firmness and strength of the printed objects.